Best Embedded Software Development Companies

Data Respons vs Innowise: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Data Respons (3.9/5) edges ahead of Innowise (3.8/5) overall. Data Respons is the better choice for nordic and multi-sector programs needing embedded engineering across regulated verticals. Innowise is the stronger option for buyers wanting embedded work bundled with broader software outsourcing capacity. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Data Respons vs Innowise: head-to-head summary

Criterion Data Respons Innowise
Founded 1986 2007
HQ Høvik, Norway Warsaw, Poland
Team size 1,400 1,001–5,000
Rating 3.9 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions Large-scale IT outsourcing capacity with an IoT/embedded delivery line inside a much broader software portfolio
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS Embedded Linux, C/C++, AWS IoT
Industries served Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security Healthcare, Fintech, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Retail

Data Respons vs Innowise: overview

Data Respons

Data Respons, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Høvik, Norway, develops embedded systems across transport & automotive, telecom & media, industrial automation, energy & maritime, medtech, space, defense & security, and finance & public sectors, employing roughly 1,400 people across Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Taiwan. AKKA Technologies acquired Data Respons via a compulsory share acquisition completed in May 2020, delisting it from the Oslo Stock Exchange; AKKA itself later became part of Akkodis (Adecco Group). For a buyer specifically evaluating whether Data Respons retains an independent embedded delivery identity post-acquisition, the answer appears to be yes — the practice remains genuinely embedded-focused rather than folded into a generalist engineering pool, but confirming current team continuity directly is still worthwhile given two ownership transitions in five years.

Innowise

Innowise, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, has grown into a multinational IT outsourcing business with a workforce reported between roughly 2,000 and 3,500+ professionals depending on the source — a range worth noting when sizing the actual embedded team available to a given program. The company's core business is broad custom software development and staff augmentation across many technology domains; IoT and embedded engineering is a delivery line within that broader business rather than the firm's founding specialty, which is the key distinction for a buyer comparing Innowise against embedded-only boutiques on this list.

Services and capabilities: Data Respons vs Innowise

Capability Data Respons Innowise
RTOS firmware development
Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot)
FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL)
Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering
IoT connectivity & protocols
Edge AI / on-device ML
Embedded GUI development
Cybersecurity & secure boot
Staff augmentation / team extension

Tech stack comparison: Data Respons vs Innowise

Framework / platform Data Respons Innowise
FreeRTOS N/A N/A
Zephyr N/A N/A
Embedded Linux
AUTOSAR N/A N/A
AWS N/A
Bluetooth N/A
LoRaWAN N/A N/A
CAN bus N/A N/A
Qt N/A
Verilog N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Data Respons vs Innowise

Criterion Data Respons Innowise
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Data Respons vs Innowise

Dimension Data Respons Innowise
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime Healthcare, Fintech, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT
Best use cases Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity, Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history IoT products needing embedded firmware plus a full cloud/mobile companion app from one vendor, Staff augmentation for teams needing to scale an existing embedded project quickly
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Data Respons vs Innowise: pros and cons

Data Respons
+ Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense
+ Nordic regional presence (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) plus Germany and Taiwan offices supports European and APAC delivery
+ Retains a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team despite two ownership transitions (AKKA in 2020, then Akkodis)
- Two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies 2020, then folded into Akkodis) — confirm current team continuity directly before committing
- 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global engineering firms for very large concurrent programs
- No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published
Innowise
+ Large delivery capacity (1,000+ engineers) can absorb bigger multi-workstream programs than boutique embedded shops
+ European (Poland) legal HQ appeals to buyers wanting EU-based contracting
+ Broader software portfolio (cloud, mobile, web) available alongside embedded work for full-stack IoT products
- Embedded/IoT is one of many practice areas rather than a core specialization — depth should be verified directly against the firm's larger generalist software business
- Reported team size varies significantly by source (2,000 to 3,500+), making exact embedded-team capacity hard to verify
- No named public embedded case studies with specific, checkable outcomes

Who should choose Data Respons?

A typical fit: maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity.

Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.

Who should choose Innowise?

A typical fit: IoT products needing embedded firmware plus a full cloud/mobile companion app from one vendor.

Large-scale IT outsourcing capacity with an IoT/embedded delivery line inside a much broader software portfolio. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Fintech, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Retail.

Decision matrix: Data Respons vs Innowise

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Data Respons
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Data Respons
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Data Respons (Not disclosed) vs Innowise (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Data Respons
You need staff augmentation or team extension Innowise
You need consulting before committing to a build Innowise

Use case fit: Data Respons vs Innowise

Use case Data Respons fit Innowise fit Winner
Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity Strong Limited Data Respons
Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history Strong Limited Data Respons
IoT products needing embedded firmware plus a full cloud/mobile companion app from one vendor Limited Strong Innowise
Staff augmentation for teams needing to scale an existing embedded project quickly Limited Strong Innowise
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Strong Innowise

Verdict: Data Respons vs Innowise

Data Respons (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions.

Innowise (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need staff augmentation for teams needing to scale an existing embedded project quickly. If your situation matches that, Innowise is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Data Respons vs Innowise FAQ

Is Data Respons better than Innowise?

Data Respons (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Data Respons's strongest advantage: nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense. Innowise's strongest advantage: large delivery capacity (1,000+ engineers) can absorb bigger multi-workstream programs than boutique embedded shops.

How do Data Respons and Innowise differ in pricing?

Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Innowise uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Data Respons or Innowise?

Innowise is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Data Respons and Innowise?

Data Respons's primary differentiator is: nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Innowise's primary differentiator is: large-scale IT outsourcing capacity with an IoT/embedded delivery line inside a much broader software portfolio. They also differ in team size (1,400 vs 1,001–5,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media vs Healthcare, Fintech).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.