Best Embedded Software Development Companies

Klika Tech vs Data Respons: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Klika Tech (4.0/5) edges ahead of Data Respons (3.9/5) overall. Klika Tech is the better choice for AWS-committed architectures needing edge firmware and cloud integration co-designed. Data Respons is the stronger option for nordic and multi-sector programs needing embedded engineering across regulated verticals. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Klika Tech vs Data Respons: head-to-head summary

Criterion Klika Tech Data Respons
Founded 2013 1986
HQ Lubbock, Texas, USA Høvik, Norway
Team size 101–250 1,400
Rating 4.0 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator AWS Premier Partner status specifically for edge-to-cloud IoT integration, reducing firmware/cloud interface risk on AWS-native architectures Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack AWS IoT, Embedded C/C++, Edge AI/ML Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS
Industries served Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy, Smart home Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security

Klika Tech vs Data Respons: overview

Klika Tech

Klika Tech, founded in 2013 by Gennadiy Mark Borisov and Val Kamenski, is headquartered in Lubbock, Texas with locations across the Americas, Europe, and Central Asia and roughly 180 employees. The firm holds AWS Premier Partner status specifically for IoT, cloud-native, data, and AI/ML solutions across edge-to-cloud platforms, plus a documented STMicroelectronics partnership on the hardware side. For a CTO whose architecture is already committed to AWS, Klika Tech's specific value is that the edge/embedded firmware and the cloud integration are designed together by the same team — reducing the interface risk between an embedded firmware vendor and a separate cloud integration vendor.

Data Respons

Data Respons, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Høvik, Norway, develops embedded systems across transport & automotive, telecom & media, industrial automation, energy & maritime, medtech, space, defense & security, and finance & public sectors, employing roughly 1,400 people across Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Taiwan. AKKA Technologies acquired Data Respons via a compulsory share acquisition completed in May 2020, delisting it from the Oslo Stock Exchange; AKKA itself later became part of Akkodis (Adecco Group). For a buyer specifically evaluating whether Data Respons retains an independent embedded delivery identity post-acquisition, the answer appears to be yes — the practice remains genuinely embedded-focused rather than folded into a generalist engineering pool, but confirming current team continuity directly is still worthwhile given two ownership transitions in five years.

Services and capabilities: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Capability Klika Tech Data Respons
RTOS firmware development
Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot)
FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL)
Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering
IoT connectivity & protocols
Edge AI / on-device ML
Embedded GUI development
Cybersecurity & secure boot
Staff augmentation / team extension

Tech stack comparison: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Framework / platform Klika Tech Data Respons
FreeRTOS N/A N/A
Zephyr N/A N/A
Embedded Linux N/A
AUTOSAR N/A N/A
AWS N/A
Bluetooth N/A
LoRaWAN N/A N/A
CAN bus N/A N/A
Qt N/A
Verilog N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Criterion Klika Tech Data Respons
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Dimension Klika Tech Data Respons
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime
Best use cases AWS-native IoT products needing edge firmware and cloud integration designed by one team to avoid interface risk, Edge AI/ML deployments requiring both embedded and cloud-native engineering under a single AWS-certified partner Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity, Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Klika Tech vs Data Respons: pros and cons

Klika Tech
+ AWS Premier Partner status specifically covers IoT, cloud-native, and AI/ML edge-to-cloud solutions, not a generic cloud-partner badge
+ Documented STMicroelectronics partnership adds hardware-adjacent credibility beyond pure software
+ Global office footprint at a still-manageable ~180-person scale keeps the team accountable rather than diffuse
- Deep AWS specialization is a poor fit for teams committed to a non-AWS cloud or wanting a platform-agnostic architecture
- Team size limits capacity for very large, multi-workstream enterprise programs
- No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published
Data Respons
+ Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense
+ Nordic regional presence (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) plus Germany and Taiwan offices supports European and APAC delivery
+ Retains a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team despite two ownership transitions (AKKA in 2020, then Akkodis)
- Two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies 2020, then folded into Akkodis) — confirm current team continuity directly before committing
- 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global engineering firms for very large concurrent programs
- No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published

Who should choose Klika Tech?

A typical fit: AWS-native IoT products needing edge firmware and cloud integration designed by one team to avoid interface risk.

AWS Premier Partner status specifically for edge-to-cloud IoT integration, reducing firmware/cloud interface risk on AWS-native architectures. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Energy, Smart home.

Who should choose Data Respons?

A typical fit: maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity.

Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.

Decision matrix: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Klika Tech
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Klika Tech
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Klika Tech (Not disclosed) vs Data Respons (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Data Respons
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Klika Tech

Use case fit: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Use case Klika Tech fit Data Respons fit Winner
AWS-native IoT products needing edge firmware and cloud integration designed by one team to avoid interface risk Strong Limited Klika Tech
Edge AI/ML deployments requiring both embedded and cloud-native engineering under a single AWS-certified partner Strong Limited Klika Tech
Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity Limited Strong Data Respons
Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history Limited Strong Data Respons
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Klika Tech vs Data Respons

Klika Tech (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. AWS Premier Partner status specifically for edge-to-cloud IoT integration, reducing firmware/cloud interface risk on AWS-native architectures.

Data Respons (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history. If your situation matches that, Data Respons is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Klika Tech vs Data Respons FAQ

Is Klika Tech better than Data Respons?

Klika Tech (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: AWS Premier Partner status specifically covers IoT, cloud-native, and AI/ML edge-to-cloud solutions, not a generic cloud-partner badge. Data Respons's strongest advantage: nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense.

How do Klika Tech and Data Respons differ in pricing?

Klika Tech uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Klika Tech or Data Respons?

Klika Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Klika Tech and Data Respons?

Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: AWS Premier Partner status specifically for edge-to-cloud IoT integration, reducing firmware/cloud interface risk on AWS-native architectures. Data Respons's primary differentiator is: nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. They also differ in team size (101–250 vs 1,400), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT vs Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.