Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Timesys (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for CTOs needing one team across hardware, firmware, and cloud. Timesys is the stronger option for programs needing long-term embedded Linux security patching and CVE tracking. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1996 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Owns electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI in-house, backed by a certified hardware lab and named semiconductor partnerships | Nearly three-decade specialization in embedded Linux security patching and multi-year maintenance tooling, now under Lynx Software Technologies |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Engineering services, tooling licenses |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux (Yocto), C/C++, Linux kernel security patching |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007, headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. For a technical buyer evaluating a delivery partner rather than just a firm to outsource to, the relevant detail is ownership of the whole stack: electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, GUI, connectivity, edge AI, and cybersecurity all sit inside one team, with ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications backing regulated-industry engagements. Semiconductor partnerships are named and specific — NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics as primary partners — rather than a generic capability list, and named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) give a checkable production track record. All IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery.
Timesys
Timesys Corporation was founded in 1996 by principals associated with Carnegie Mellon University's real-time systems research and built one of the first real-time-enhanced embedded Linux distributions. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with roughly 60 employees, the company's long-running specialty is embedded Linux security patching and long-term maintenance tooling — a specific, underserved niche in a market where most vendors focus on initial development rather than the multi-year support tail. In December 2023, Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys; buyers evaluating the company now should confirm directly which legacy Timesys processes and personnel remain in place post-acquisition, since that kind of transition is exactly the sort of thing a procurement team should verify rather than assume.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Engineering services, Tooling/licensing |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking |
| Best use cases | Multi-domain hardware programs where coordinating separate electrical, firmware, and cloud vendors has become the bottleneck, Medical device firmware needing ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aware development from a certified team | Products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching, Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Engineering services |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Single accountable team across electrical design, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI, removing the coordination overhead of a multi-vendor stack |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications directly support FDA/HIPAA medical, ISO 26262 automotive, and IEC 62443 energy engagements |
| + | Named semiconductor partnerships (NXP, Microchip, STMicroelectronics) plus a documented in-house lab for board bring-up and hardware validation |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on every engagement — no vendor lock-in on the codebase |
| + | Public case studies with named outcomes: OCPP-compliant EV charging control software, a bioprinter capability upgrade, STM32 firmware porting for a Caltech medical device |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — supports development and ongoing maintenance but hands off mass production to the client or a third party |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — provides documentation and engineering support, but the client owns the actual approval process |
| - | No published pricing tiers; scoping requires a direct technical discovery call rather than a self-serve rate card |
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) that most embedded vendors treat as an afterthought |
| + | Carnegie Mellon-linked founding team gives the company real-time Linux research credibility dating to the mid-1990s |
| + | Long operating history (since 1996) means extensive documentation and tooling maturity |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software Technologies in December 2023 — confirm directly which legacy Timesys team and processes are still active before committing |
| - | Team size (~60) caps capacity for large concurrent programs relative to bigger engineering firms |
| - | No public pricing or minimum engagement figures for pre-qualification |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: multi-domain hardware programs where coordinating separate electrical, firmware, and cloud vendors has become the bottleneck.
Owns electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI in-house, backed by a certified hardware lab and named semiconductor partnerships. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching.
Nearly three-decade specialization in embedded Linux security patching and multi-year maintenance tooling, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Timesys (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Timesys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-domain hardware programs where coordinating separate electrical, firmware, and cloud vendors has become the bottleneck | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Medical device firmware needing ISO 13485/IEC 62304-aware development from a certified team | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Products with long product-support commitments needing ongoing embedded Linux CVE monitoring and patching | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Owns electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI in-house, backed by a certified hardware lab and named semiconductor partnerships.
Timesys (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering from a team with research-grade origins. If your situation matches that, Timesys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: single accountable team across electrical design, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI, removing the coordination overhead of a multi-vendor stack. Timesys's strongest advantage: explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring) that most embedded vendors treat as an afterthought.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Timesys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Timesys uses engineering services, tooling licenses pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Timesys?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: owns electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI in-house, backed by a certified hardware lab and named semiconductor partnerships. Timesys's primary differentiator is: nearly three-decade specialization in embedded Linux security patching and multi-year maintenance tooling, now under Lynx Software Technologies. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Industrial IoT, Medical devices).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.